Tag Archives: social media

It’s All Straw

The Twitterverse exploded this morning because of a tweet by Pope Francis: ”My thoughts turn to all who are unemployed, often as a result of a self-centred mindset bent on profit at any cost.”  Many of my fellow conservatives in particular were infuriated that the Holy Father would appear to lay the blame for unemployment at the feet of capitalism, which is not in fact what he was saying.   Yet in writing what he did, the Pope called attention to something which many devout Christians in the Western world regularly forget: this life will end, and sooner than you think.

Before we begin, a bit of history should be kept in mind here by conservatives who are hopping mad at the Holy Father today, and who will then jump for joy at what he might tweet next week.   Pope Francis was not advocating some sort of socialist economic model, or saying that capitalism is the work of the Devil.  Keep in mind that he was the Cardinal-Archbishop of Buenos Aires until just a few weeks ago.  If you know anything of what has happened to Argentina economically and politically over the past decade, the Pope is all too well-aware of the impact of various economic theories and practices.  Moreover, he was certainly no ally of the current populist-socialist President of Argentina, who imagines herself some sort of Kmart version of Eva Perón.

There are many areas of overlap between conservatism and Christianity, but there are also many areas of tension.  While recently a number of Christian denominations have adopted a policy of going along to get along, with regard to various societal and political issues, the Catholic Church remains immovable on a number of fundamental points, as she has for the past two thousand years of her existence.  One of those points is that love of both God and neighbor is the basis for the truly Christian life.  And while not in principle against the possession of wealth, the Christian does not make its pursuit his reason for living.

As we heard in the Gospel reading at mass this past Sunday, “‘I give you a new commandment: love one another. As I have loved you, so you also should love one another.  This is how all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.’ ” (St. John 13:34-35)

Nothing the Pope tweeted today was new, as you can see here for example, from two sections of the Catechism of the Catholic Church which point to the inherent dangers of both atheist socialism AND unfettered capitalism:

2124  The name “atheism” covers many very different phenomena. One common form is the practical materialism which restricts its needs and aspirations to space and time. Atheistic humanism falsely considers man to be “an end to himself, and the sole maker, with supreme control, of his own history.”  Another form of contemporary atheism looks for the liberation of man through economic and social liberation. “It holds that religion, of its very nature, thwarts such emancipation by raising man’s hopes in a future life, thus both deceiving him and discouraging him from working for a better form of life on earth.”

2424    A theory that makes profit the exclusive norm and ultimate end of economic activity is morally unacceptable. The disordered desire for money cannot but produce perverse effects. It is one of the causes of the many conflicts which disturb the social order.  A system that “subordinates the basic rights of individuals and of groups to the collective organization of production” is contrary to human dignity.  Every practice that reduces persons to nothing more than a means of profit enslaves man, leads to idolizing money, and contributes to the spread of atheism. “You cannot serve God and Mammon.”

Secular materialism is not an illness confined only to those who practice socialism.  There are many conservatives, including those who call themselves Christians, who bow and worship at the feet of people like economists and market gurus, leaving God out of the picture entirely, or relegating Him to some sort of secondary place in their lives.  This is a very dangerous path to tread, and a choice which Catholics believe has eternal consequences.

In St. Paul’s first letter to Timothy, the Apostle to the Gentiles lays out, very simply, why the pursuit of wealth leads nowhere:

For we brought nothing into the world, just as we shall not be able to take anything out of it.
If we have food and clothing, we shall be content with that.
Those who want to be rich are falling into temptation and into a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires, which plunge them into ruin and destruction.
For the love of money is the root of all evils, and some people in their desire for it have strayed from the faith and have pierced themselves with many pains.

(1 Timothy 6:7-10)

Please note, no one is saying that wealth is something which is inherently evil.  After all, the ministry of Christ Himself, and later that of the Apostles and the Church, would have been impossible without the material support of those Christians with the means to help.  Rather wealth is a tool, and what one does with that tool, for good or for ill, will give lie to what is really important in one’s life.  For in the end, no matter how much wealth one creates or accumulates, we are, all of us, worm food.

Many Catholics and non-Catholics alike are familiar with the prolific medieval writer St. Thomas Aquinas, one of the greatest thinkers of the Church.  One of my favorite passages from his copious output - and be assured I have not even read 1/100th of it – is something which I not infrequently recall to myself.  It is useful to keep in mind both when things go wrong in life, but also when things are going well.

While celebrating mass one day in 1273, St. Thomas apparently received a mystical vision of Heaven; as a result, he stopped writing to prepare himself spiritually to go home to the Lord.  ”All that I have written seems like straw to me,” he is reported to have said, in response to urges from others that he resume writing, “compared to what has been revealed to me.”  St. Thomas was by no means rejecting the work he had already done, nor its value to those whom it had helped and indeed continues to help to this day.  Rather he realized that all he had been working on and doing in the material world paled in comparison to what was coming across the great divide, and knew that he had to prepare himself for it, even as close as he was to God.

The fact is that the Pope is right.  Many times hard-working people find themselves unemployed not because they are lazy, or because they are doing a poor job, but because the wealthy chose to protect their own fortunes, and not care for their struggling workers.  This is not a blanket statement, nor an endorsement of trade unionism or forcible wealth distribution.  Rather it is a simple fact of life: these things do happen, and are happening all the time, all over the world.

The Pope is also correct in reminding us of the inherent human tendency of selfishness, and this is why Christianity, which is founded on a Divine act of loving unselfishness, is not as easy a Faith to take on as many of us would like to believe.  The Catholic Church was built on sacrifice and blood, both of Christ’s on Calvary, and of the countless martyrs who suffered torture and death rather than submit to selfishness and sin.  Human beings never like to be reminded of the fact that we are sinners; we all like to think that we are, to paraphrase C.S. Lewis, nice folks.  The truth is that under the right circumstances, we will not only take whatever we can from one another, but we will actually relish doing it – and that is what makes self-sacrifice such a very hard thing to achieve.

Thus Pope Francis’ job, lest those reading this forget it, is not to help the Republicans take over the Senate or lower the cost of crude oil.  The Holy Father is on Twitter not to chit-chat, but to get as many people to Heaven as he can.  You may not have thought about that, when you posted your snarky comment about the Pope this morning, but there it is.  He is trying to teach us both by word and by example what it means to be a Christian.  Sometimes that instruction is easily palatable, and sometimes we find it bitter and difficult to swallow.

For at the end of your life, God will not care whether you had 100 or 100,000 Twitter followers, or whether a celebrity re-tweeted you, or whether you appeared on Twitchy, BuzzFeed, or any other aggregate site.  Nor for that matter will He care whether you died a rich man or a poor one.   Rather, when you die and go before Him, you are going to have to show Him that you loved Him, as He loved you, and that you demonstrated that love in the way you treated other people, sacrificing your own comforts to meet someone else’s needs, in imitation of the same self-sacrificial love that Christ demonstrated to His followers.

Remember that, as He Himself pointed out, the Son of Man had nowhere to lay His head.  He was laid on a bed of straw which did not belong to Him at His birth, and He was laid in a rock tomb which did not belong to Him at His death, and from which He rose on Easter Sunday.   So now would be a good time to ask yourself, if you were angry at the Pope today, whether you are so detached from the world and materialism as to remember that if you are a Christian, these three things are more important to you than absolutely anything whatsoever having to do with the economy.  You are not made for this world, but for the next.

Tomasso

Detail of “The Vision of St. Thomas Aquinas” by Santi de Tito (1593)
San Marco, Florence

10 Comments

Filed under culture

I’m Auctioning Off My 100,000th Tweet for Charity

If you follow me on Twitter, then you may be aware that after several years on said social media site I am rapidly approaching my 100,000th tweet.  Normally this would be an achievement of dubious distinction – though I am friendly with people who have had two and three times as many tweets.  However I have decided to put this opportunity to good use.

Thanks to a suggestion from my good friend, the redoubtable American Papist, I am going to auction off my 100,00th tweet for charity.

Here are the rules:

1.  I will reserve my 100,00th tweet for the auction winner, and will post whatever tweet you want.  Your only restrictions are to please keep it clean, unoffensive, and under 140 characters.

2.  Think creatively! For example, you might want me to wish someone a happy birthday or anniversary; promote your business or blog, or just have me say something amusing and unexpected.  You are only limited by your imagination and by generally accepted standards of good taste.  The resulting tweet will reach not only my Twitter followers, but also readers of my blogs, and listeners to the Catholic Weekend show.

3.  Bids are in $5.00 increments.

4.  To bid, please tweet to me at @wbdnewton using the hashtag #100KBilly.  If you are not on Twitter, get someone who is to bid on your behalf.  You will then be able to do a search for that hashtag or look on my timeline to see what the current high bid is.

5.  For the sake of clarity, I will also periodically announce the highest current bid both on Twitter and via updates on this blog post.

6.  The auction will end at 12:01 AM Eastern on this coming Saturday, February 9, 2013.

7.  The winner will be announced on the “Catholic Weekend” show at 10:00 AM Eastern on Saturday, February 9, 2013, as well as on Twitter and this blog.

8.  The charity to benefit must be one which we can both agree to.  Ideally I would like to help a Catholic charitable organization, such as the Little Sisters of the Poor, who have homes for the elderly poor in cities around the U.S. and all over the world.

Even if in the end my tweets are only worth two or three bids, I will be beyond happy.  To have the opportunity to help out a worthy cause in a creative way, rather than just let this moment pass by, is a great privilege.  Thank you in advance both for your readership, and for your generosity to those in need.

LSotP

The Little Sisters of the Poor care for the impoverished and elderly
in many cities across the U.S. and around the world

+++++

AUCTION UPDATE: 2/7/13 6:30 pm Eastern

Current Leader: https://twitter.com/albertagooner/status/299633028207087617

Current High Bid: $150.00

———-

AUCTION UPDATE: 2/7/13 4:00 pm Eastern

Current Leader: https://twitter.com/PatGohn/status/299620996636356608

Current High Bid: $100.00

———-

AUCTION UPDATE: 2/6/13 6:30 pm Eastern

Current Leader: https://twitter.com/annie3592/status/299278232870592512

Current High Bid: $75.00

———-

AUCTION UPDATE: 2/6/13 5:00 pm Eastern

Current Leader: https://twitter.com/mariannasipod/status/299260614692438016

Current High Bid: $60.00

———-

AUCTION UPDATE: 2/6/13 1:30 pm Eastern

Current Leader: https://twitter.com/mariannasipod/status/299212743507050497

Current High Bid: $50.00

———-

AUCTION UPDATE: 2/6/13 12:00 pm Eastern

Current Leader: https://twitter.com/bymags/status/299182762664005632

Current High Bid:  $25.00

2 Comments

Filed under culture

March For Life Meet-Up

March for Life Meet-Up
Friday, January 25, 2013
11:00 am – 1:00 pm
National Gallery of Art
Cascade Cafe

As we announced on the most recent episode of SQPN’s Catholic Weekend show, I am organizing an informal meet-up – or in Twitter parlance, a tweet-up – for SQPN fans, my blog readers and Twitter followers, and those just looking to meet other pro-life supporters who will be attending the annual March for Life here in Washington, D.C.

As SQPN’s founder and CEO Father Roderick always tries to arrange informal meetings with fans of the network when he travels, it seems appropriate to follow his example given that many SQPN listeners will be attending the March for Life this year.  I have already heard from several SQPN listeners/podcasters that they will be making an effort to stop by and hang out before the March begins, and one of our SQPN supporters hopes to take a few group photos for us.  It will be terrific to meet some of the people committed to the good work that SQPN does, and who until now I have not had the pleasure of meeting in person.

Equally, I hope that those who read these pages will consider coming by to say hello if you will be attending the March for Life.  So many of you over the years have been kind enough to both read and to share what I write with others.  It will be good to shake your hand and thank you for your readership.

I’ve selected the Cascade Cafe of the National Gallery of Art for the meet-up point.  It was chosen primarily because the Rally for Life and the starting point for the March for Life is the area of the National Mall located between 7th and 9th Streets NW, and the National Gallery of Art is located on the National Mall at 7th Street NW.  The Rally begins about 12 noon and will continue until around 1:30 pm, before it steps off and heads around the National Gallery itself, before heading up Capitol Hill.  You can read more about the route and other information on the March for Life website.

The Cascade Cafe is the underground food court at the National Gallery of Art.  It is a large space with flexible seating and table arrangements.  Because it is an informal food court space, you will be able to relax and get something to eat or drink, warm up from the cold, visit the facilities, and rest your feet before the March begins.  (Though keep in mind that no doubt a number of marchers will have the same idea.)

And please note: there is NO admission charge for the National Gallery of Art.  Entrance is free, since it is affiliated with the Smithsonian Institution.  Though because it is a Federal building, you will have to pass through metal detectors or inspection.  There is a free coat and bag check as well.

Here is an illustration of the section of the National Mall where the Rally and starting point for the March for Life are located, and its relationship to the National Gallery, Capitol, and other buildings:

Mall

Here is a photograph of the entrance to the National Gallery of Art which faces the National Mall:

NGA

Once you are inside the museum, you will want to follow the signs or ask to be directed to the Cascade Cafe.  Because there are several different restaurants and cafes inside the National Gallery, make sure that you are headed toward the “Cascade Cafe” specifically. The cafe offers everything from coffee and soda, wine and beer, to pizza and burgers, salads and chef’s specials, pastries and desserts, etc.  Here are some photographs of part of the space, so that you know what you are looking for.  It takes its name from the underground waterfall that you can see from the windows in the third photo:

Cafe1

Cafe2

Cafe3

Should you have any questions please feel free to use the contact form to get in touch, or just tweet me at @wbdnewton as I plan to do my best to live-tweet from the meet-up, depending on cell phone reception.  You can also visit the National Gallery of Art’s website for maps, hours, and facilities information.  I look forward to meeting many of you!

5 Comments

Filed under culture

Pulling Heartstrings on Social Media

Sometimes I may not appreciate being told what to do, but I always resent being told how I ought to feel.  Yet on a daily basis, in matters large and small, I find myself being told that I must have emotional reactions to things as grave as the civil war in Syria, or as trivial as which brand of loo paper will better my life, all couched in the same terms.  Whether you realize it or not, gentle reader, this insidious type of manipulation is happening to you as well, all the time. Only now, it is not only happening in print or television media, but in your social media world as well.

Yesterday afternoon, barring some unforeseen intervention, a dog who shall remain nameless was put down at an animal shelter which shall also remain nameless. Admittedly this is not some new occurrence: it happens every day, all over the United States and indeed around the world.  I only know about it because someone placed this information in my social media timeline. Yet what truly struck me was not so much the plight of the dog, but rather the way in which I learnt of her impending doom.

For you see, the shelter housing the dog tweeted out that unless the dog was rescued by a certain time yesterday afternoon, the dog would be destroyed. This tweet included a picture and brief description of the dog, as well as contact information should the person who saw the tweet decide to save the dog’s life.  Needless to say, I found this rather dramatic.

As an experiment, I decided to share the tweet and see what sort of responses it elicited from my followers.  I asked those who cared to respond what they thought about this tweet, but I did not include any editorial comments of my own.  Rather, I wanted to see what sort of reactions I would receive from a cross-section of people. Admittedly this was not a scientific poll nor a carefully controlled survey, but the results are still instructive.

Reactions were split almost exactly into two equal camps. Half of the respondents were moved by pity to say that the tweet emotionally affected them, and were saddened by their inability to do anything to help the dog. These ranged from expressions of wanting to adopt the dog if they could, to feelings of heartbreak, concern, and so on. I did not have the heart to point out that a visit to the shelter’s profile page would reveal that there were, in fact, dozens of other dogs with the same sad story of nearing death unless they were adopted by a certain deadline.

Others, however, had quite a different reaction to this tweet, including at least one dog owner.

One described the tweet as “cheap” and “sensational”. They felt that the attempt failed to make them feel guilty, however, though they could not explain why it had failed. Another compared the shelter unfavorably to those who post images of dead people on social media to shock people and attract attention for a particular cause, while another said they had never seen anything like it on Twitter before, and did not appreciate it. Still another described the tweet as merely “crass emotional manipulation”.

What was particularly interesting was the fact that some of those whose strongest emotional reaction was pity did not at first appear to realize the effect the impending deadline had on them.  Once this was pointed out to them, upon further reflection several suddenly realized that they were being manipulated. Once they had accepted that there was nothing they could do for the dog, and their initial sense of sorrow for the dog had given way to rationality, they recognized that they had been “handled”.

To my mind, there is something rather more macabre about announcing that you will be killing an animal, than simply doing it quietly. It reminds me a bit of posting a bill at a place of execution such as Tyburn in London, saying that so-and-so will be hanged, drawn, and quartered by order of Bad Queen Bess on such-and-such a day, should you care to come along and bring a picnic lunch. Though of course there is a very important difference here, and that is that animals, much as we may love them, are not human beings. To react to the putting down of a dog as something akin to execution is to hold an imbalanced view one’s place in the natural order.

More to the point of this piece however, this is an example of how a group of people can have completely different reactions to the same information, based on how that information is presented to them. Both editorial boards and advertising agencies have understood for a long time that by playing the emotional heartstrings, the public can be manipulated into doing whatever you want, whether it is selling newspapers to start a war, or asking people to watch a monkey throw excrement from behind a screen. William Randolph Hearst built San Simeon as a result of the former, and Piers Morgan is on CNN because of the latter.

Despite the supposed media-savvy nature of those of us who are Gen-X and younger, Americans are still far too easily influenced by those who whip up an emotional overreaction on the part of their target audience. This is nothing new, of course, for examples abound in American history. Yet so often we focus on national and international issues, analyzing what a pundit or a politician means in a major speech, that we miss the more mundane forms of that level of manipulation when we come across them in daily life.

Therefore pay attention in your social media, gentle reader, the next time you read a tweet or see a post that makes you feel emotional. All human beings feel emotions, but not all emotional reactions are ultimately beneficial. Take the time to ask yourself: do I really agree with what I am being asked to do or believe, here? For oftentimes you will discover that the rational, adult reaction is to take a deep breath, and not allow yourself to be manipulated.

Sargent
“Marionettes” by John Singer Sargent (1903)
Private Collection

5 Comments

Filed under culture

Cultivating Mystery in a Confessional Culture

The prospect of meeting up with an old friend whom you have not seen in quite some time can take one of two turns.  Either it is someone you’ve kept in regular contact with, and you are not going to have to play a huge amount of catch-up, or it is someone whom you have not spoken to with any frequency, and you have some choices to make.  It can be difficult to decide whether you plunge in and share everything that’s happened since you last saw each other, or whether you hold back since you are not that close anymore.  However this is not just an individual problem each of us has from time to time, but rather something which at present troubles society as a whole.

Paradoxically, we live in an age when no one feels the need to seek the sacrament of confession with any regularity, and yet everyone feels compelled to confess the most intimate details of their lives on social media.  This is something which used to be the almost exclusive purview of insecure entertainers, who could not be certain whether or not they were alive unless they were on-screen, on stage, or in the papers.  Now, this desire for personal glorification is everywhere.  It may once have fueled the plots of classic films like “Sunset Boulevard”, but it is now demonstrated among the untalented and ordinary by the inexplicably long-lived careers of the various members of the Kardashian clan.

That being said, there is still a place – a very important place – for moments when personal moments or thoughts are revealed.  We can think of the beauty of revelation demonstrated in C.S. Lewis’ classic “Surprised By Joy”, for example, or the often melancholy works of Frederic Chopin.  Cancer survivors learn from one another’s experiences with coping through books, talks, and support groups.  New parents learn from been-there-done-that parents in pre-natal classes and videos.

Yet even when there are revelations in such incredibly personal and intimate areas of human experience as these – faith, love, illness, birth – there must also be some element of restraint.  It is deeply regrettable that we have lost our old appreciation for mystery, in favor of throwing everything into the harsh glare of the klieg lights.  For it is in celebrating mystery that the imagination of mankind created its wonders.

An obvious instance of this is in how Western Christians worship God.  At some point in recent history, God stopped being viewed as the Almighty: mysterious, powerful, and benevolent.  Instead, he started to be seen as our peer, who would overlook anything we did wrong so long as we loved one another, under whatever definition of love one preferred to adopt.  There was to be no more fuss, no more muss, and the prayer shifted from, “Have mercy on me, Oh Lord, a sinner,” to “I’m okay, you’re okay.”  This seismic shift from God as God to God as drinking buddy was reflected in architecture, music, art, and the like.

Similarly, when women decided to “liberate” themselves from actually being women, and when men rather stupidly agreed to go along with the excesses of this and stop being men, this change was reflected in numerous ways.  It was shown in the types of films produced, for example, where the man is little more than a bundle of uncontrolled stimuli looking for an intelligent woman with vast amounts of previous sexual experience to get him under control.  It was reflected in how each of the sexes dressed, to the point where now in many cases the runways are full of garments which are completely interchangeable with no difference between them.

When there is no mystery, no “otherness”, there is no wonder.  When we share everything about ourselves with just about anyone who will listen, we cheapen ourselves and our experiences.  And much as I appreciate your readership, gentle reader, there are certain aspects of my life to which you will not be privy unless you happen to be a close friend (and perhaps not even then), for the simple reason that they are none of your business.  That is admittedly a counter-cultural attitude to take in the present day, but given the lack of culture in our present day it is in fact the only possible and sensible attitude to take.

So tonight when I have cocktails with my old friend, it will be good to catch up, and share stories of what has been going on in each of our lives.  Yet at the same time I have no intention of using the hour or two we have in each other’s company to create some kind of tawdry news bulletin about the myriad of things I have experienced since last we saw each other.  For some things, in the end, are better kept to oneself - a fact which, regrettably, contemporary society does not seem to understand.

Frangelico
“St. Peter Martyr” by Fra Angelico (c. 1441)
Museo di San Marco, Florence

13 Comments

Filed under culture