Tag Archives: friendship

The Courtier Pays a Call

Last evening I visited some good friends after work for a couple of hours, having a drink outside on their balcony and enjoying both the conversation and summer-like weather.  One of the benefits of getting older is realizing how often such evenings are infinitely more pleasurable, memorable, and even educational than ones spent either surrounded by a great deal of noise and activity, or entirely on one’s own.  The reason I suspect this is the case is something that Count Castiglione himself understood very well, for in fact it forms the framework for his “Book of the Courtier”, from which this blog takes its inspiration, and that is the importance of actual conversation between human beings, and what that conversation does to examine and to build up our society.

Back before the Western world turned in on itself in selfishness and the worship of fleeting images projected onto flat screens, people of all social classes used to engage in what was collectively referred to as “paying calls.”  This involved physically going to visit a neighbor, friend, or relative, in order to discuss how everyone was doing, the news and events of the day, and so on.  The manner and timing of the visit would vary according both to personal desire and local practice.  In one part of the world for example, it might be customary to pay calls after church on Sunday; in another, it might be that one visited one’s neighbor only in the cool of the evening after chores were finished for the day.

When calling upon others was considered standard practice, the “people from the manor” visited their neighbors and friends, and received visitors in turn, just as the farm laborers working in their fields did in their own cottages.  The merchants in the towns and cities engaged in it, as did their customers.  Please note that in observing this fact, I am not making reference to some dreamy fantasy of what life might have been like in the days before television and the internet: it was simply a fact of life that unless you were desperately poor – and even the poor would visit one another to bring comfort and solace in their commiseration - you had a duty to behave this way if you were to be considered civilized. Ask your grandparents about what life was like when they were younger, and chances are they will tell you about paying calls, or whatever the practice may have been referred to where they lived, where the adults relished the opportunity to sit and talk with other adults.

We can see just how essential this practice was, for paying calls takes place among all classes of society throughout the canon of Western literature.  It is recounted throughout centuries of fiction: without even having to go look up the actual passages, I can think of such scenes in the work of writers such as Jane Austen, Mark Twain, Leo Tolstoy, Honoré de Balzac, Eudora Welty, James Boswell, Bailey White, Arnold Bennett, Laura Ingalls Wilder, James Joyce, and countless others.  It was such a common practice, with so many local varieties, that sometimes the rules surrounding this practice could become quite rigid – even comically so.

Take the beautiful BBC miniseries “Cranford”, for example, based on the novels of Elizabeth Gaskell.  The spinster sisters Miss Deborah and Miss Mattie Jenkins inform their recently-arrived houseguest from the metropolis of Manchester, Miss Mary Smith, of all the multiple protocols adopted locally over the years, as to when and where and how such visits are to take place.  These unwritten commandments on paying calls provide a seemingly endless source of amusement for the  viewer, as the maid repeatedly errs in how she announces visitors, or the visitors themselves stay too long, or raise subjects that are not supposed to be addressed during such get-togethers.

Yet comedy aside, the important thing to note from the practice of visiting and holding conversation on a regular basis in the home, was that it held families and communities together.  When we started building Western civilization through working together, these practices helped to both create and give life to society, and to thereafter keep that society going.  And this marvelous feat of not actually slaughtering each other in the street was accomplished by bringing people face to face within a framework of behaving with respect in someone else’s home, however grand or humble that home might be.

As I wrote about earlier this week, with the coming of shorter days and colder temperatures, many of us are going to become more isolated, turning to television and the internet for company, and we need to make an effort to reach out to those who might be isolated because of the change of seasons.  However I would also suggest that regardless of the time of year, for the larger health of our society, paying calls on a regular basis with those in our community is something we ought to consider reviving.  Perhaps not in as formal a way as it was practiced previously, but we can use technology to make such meetings easier to arrange.  And once we do meet, then the technology can be switched off or ignored, and the type of conversations which led to the building up of Western civilization can once again take place.


“Rev. Thomson paying a call on Mr. and Mrs. Harris in their home”
Life Magazine

6 Comments

Filed under culture

Bring Warmth to Someone

It is difficult to say exactly what it is about the autumn that makes many of us go into a kind of social hibernation.  It may be the angle of the sun as it skims lower along the horizon which reminds us of time flying past, or the curl of the leaves as they turn brown and rustle off the trees to the ground.  With less sunlight, shorter days, and colder temperatures, you would think that, logically, human beings would seek to come closer together to share warmth and solace.  Only nowadays we don’t tend to do this: we bundle up and go off to our respective hobbit holes, which may be nice and snug, but they are not very communal.

If you happen to have more than one pet, or have observed how animals on a farm behave, they tend to stick together, particularly when it is cold and dark, for warmth and companionship.  Yet for all the time we humans spend together outdoors in summer, as soon as the season turns we begin retreating indoors and into ourselves.  Were it not for holidays, many of us would have little in the way of non-work-related interaction at all: and some of us will not have any even then.

It has long been said that one reason the Scandinavians were such early pioneers in mobile phone technology was because they were so isolated from one another during the long winters that ravage their region.  We can all associate in our minds the concept of Scandinavian people wanting to be by themselves, even in harsh weather.  Yet as it turns out this is not really much good for the descendants of the vikings, or indeed for any of us.

The world of cinema is a good way to see this.  The legendary Swedish-American film star Greta Garbo did not actually want to be alone, as it turned out, she wanted to be left alone – but in her case, the reputation established about her ended up isolating her, making a Garbo sighting in New York something like seeing a fluke of nature rather than a human being.  In the wonderful Danish film “Babette’s Feast”, we see how the villagers’ cottages are all huddled together for practical protection, but they are generally such reserved and quiet people that they make no connection with one another outside of church, until the charity of a French cook brings them all, at least for an evening, together into warmth and love, despite the cold.  And in the Norwegian film “Kitchen Stories”, men in an isolated farming community in Norway are so desperate for basic human affection and companionship, that for much of the film they cannot even bring themselves to say so.

Autumn and winter holidays are all very well, but they are one day affairs, and the nights are now going to be long and cold for quite a few months up here in the Northern Hemisphere.  Perhaps as this season proceeds you will consider ways that you can reach out to others in unexpected ways, by offering to drop by or asking them to come over, or even just picking up that mobile device as intended, to make the darker hours pass more easily.  Those with families can bring those without into their circle, for example, or three or four individuals can make an effort of getting those individuals together to share some time in both talking and listening.

In serving others in this way, not only will you be doing good for someone else, in making the dark time of year seem a bit less dark, but you may also be doing yourself a very good service in turn.


Couple Having a Meal Before a Fireplace
by Quiringh van Brekelenkam (c. 1650)
Private Collection

1 Comment

Filed under culture

Zealous and Active Friendships Through New Media

If you have visited this site before then you know that periodically I like to take the time to encourage my readers to get involved in new media, beyond simple passive engagement.  I do so not because I am some great tech-media guru, but because my experience thus far has proven to be so worthwhile, with respect to the connections I have made, and how those connections have opened my mind to new possibilities, new experiences, and new ways of thinking, that I want to encourage others to experience the same joy of learning, discovery, and the formation of new friendships.  Never forgetting that the patron of this blog, Count Baldassare Castiglione, has much wisdom to share with us across the centuries, it might be useful to read some of what he has to say about forming worthwhile connections, and then consider how we might go about using the tools of new media to form them.

Castiglione writes that it is a good idea for us to have a particularly close friend or two, with whom we can be completely open about everything.  However he counsels that such discussions of deeply personal matters should be limited to private moments, rather than broadcast for all to hear – something which our present culture, sprawled out on Oprah Winfrey’s cheap, pop psychology couch with its bathrobe hanging open, ought to take into consideration.  Castiglione suggests that it is in the careful selection of a friend or friends whom we can trust, and who is more or less “another self”, as it were, that we will be able to have the kind of reinforcement of encouraging our character that we all need.  ”And in all this I am speaking of the good and virtuous,” he writes, “for the friendship of the wicked is not friendship.”

However he goes on to say that part of that reinforcement of character comes from how we engage with other friends and acquaintances, who are perhaps not quite as close to us.  Castiglione recognizes that being out and about in the world means that we may have to associate with people who are very different from ourselves.  That being said, he writes that the courtier must remain true to himself:

And he will accomplish this if he be courteous, kind, generous, affable, and mild with others, zealous and active to serve and guard his friends’ welfare and honor both absent and present, enduring such of their natural defects as are endurable, without breaking with them for slight cause, and correcting in himself those that are kindly pointed out.

This is rather strong counsel, indeed, on how we are to relate to one another.  Yet I also see it as an encouragement, on the part of our beloved Count, with respect to the formation of new connections.  This is where, for many of us, new media can be a wonderful tool for reaching out to others and forming good, encouraging connections with others, that can potentially become friendships as well.  For as Castiglione notes, a good friendship is one that is both zealous and service-oriented.

Regular readers of these pages know that I am a proud practitioner of popery.  Therefore it should come as no surprise that some of these, highly unusual connections and opportunities have come out of my Catholic Faith.  I would like to share three examples of this which all occurred over this past weekend, as I believe they are illustrative of what can happen if you get involved in new media and make good use of it, hopefully along the lines Castiglione intended.

Via social media, I met my friend Deacon Kyle Sanders, a seminarian in the Archdiocese of New Orleans, and have had the chance to meet him in real life on two occasions so far, when he has visited the capital.  Deacon Kyle recently suffered an horrific ankle dislocation, and was scheduled to undergo surgery this past Friday.  In conversation I pointed out to him that his surgery was to take place on the Feast of St. Toribio de Mogrovejo, a Spanish saint who founded the first seminary in the Americas; I suggested that it might be a good idea to ask for his intercession, seeing as how he was a good patron saint for seminarians.  What happened next is really rather extraordinary, as you can read on Deacon Kyle’s blog post from Friday.

On Saturday, I was asked to be on the “Catholic Weekend” show over at SQPN.com, which you can listen to here.  Toward the end of the program, the guests took part in a Catholic trivia quiz, and one of the questions happened to be about St. Toribio.  This gave me the opportunity to share Deacon Kyle’s experience with others, who might not otherwise have come across it, leading to the possibility of more people getting in touch with him through his blog, or wanting to learn more about the life and work of St. Toribio.

Then on Sunday, via my side project Catholic Barcelona, I received an inquiry through the site’s contact form from a young lady living in Barcelona.  She is a native English speaker studying Spanish there, and was interested in the possibility of becoming a Catholic, but wanted to know whether I knew of anywhere she could contact in the city to discuss this in English.  With the help of a friend in Barcelona, whom I met via social media long before meeting in person, I gave her the contact information for the English-speaking Catholic community there, asking her to follow up with me if that did not lead anywhere.  Hopefully she will be able to find the assistance she needs as she prepares to cross the Tiber, and I wish her the best as she does so.

While the preceding examples all have to do with Catholicism, by no means is that the only way by which I have been fortunate enough to connect to others.  Whether it is Topher Matthews at the Georgetown Metropolitan and Shaun Courtney over at the Georgetown Patch liking and linking to my blog post yesterday on a new show at a local art gallery, engaging in what my sister likes to refer to as online “hoarding” over at Pinterest,  or enjoying exchanges of information and wordplay on Twitter, Facebook, and so on, there are many opportunities provided by these resources to create or deepen friendships and connections.  It is only a question of taking the time to remember that these must be balanced by real-life relationships and interactions as well, otherwise they are merely an exercise in providing the brain with dopamine.  And in all cases, trying to be that zealous and service-oriented advocate which Castiglione describes is something which I often fall short of, but try my best to keep in mind and act upon as best I can.

And with all of that being said, I would turn the mirror in your direction and point  out that there is nothing to stop you, gentle reader, from doing the same thing.  You do not have to be a blogger, or a viral filmmaker, or a podcaster to be able to reach out via new media.  If you like a blog, or a video, or a podcast, for example, then leaving comments and engaging with the creators of that content, as well as with others who enjoy the content, is a terrific way to start building these types of connections.  Yes, I know, many times comment boards and the like are filled with people looking for a fight, but Castiglione would tell you that there is no need to even engage in this: focus instead on engaging with those whom you find interesting.

There is so much negative content now in our media, that there really should be a greater effort on our part to bypass it, rather than deal with the perversity and cheapness of what presently passes for both news and entertainment.  Fortunately, new media outlets provide us not only with such a bypass, but also with a way to connect directly with others who share our interests, and whose support can prove edifying to our character.  I would encourage the reader to take the words of Castiglione to heart, and consider interacting more actively with others through these new resources.  The benefits of building positive connections, productive communities, and being of service to others will be worth whatever investment you make.


Detail from “The Meeting of St. Francis and St. Dominic” by Benozzo Gozzoli (1452)
Chapel of San Francesco, Montefalco, Umbria

Leave a Comment

Filed under culture

Media and the Promise of Friendship

With the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (“CPAC”) about to get underway here in Washington, many of those in attendance will have their first opportunity to meet in real life those whom they have come to know via new media, such as blogging and podcasting, and via social media, such as Facebook and Twitter.  No doubt some people will be thrilled to finally meet each other in person, and their shared experiences at the conference will provide them with opportunities to cement their relationships.  Others, however, will probably come away disappointed to discover that the person whom they thought they liked is not as interesting or attractive a personality in real life as they are online.

We might make a reasonable observation that two people who have certain interests, views, or background experiences in common are more likely to form a friendship than those who have little or nothing in common.  Yet it is true for this scrivener at least that the older one gets the more one comes to realize that commonality is no guarantee of affinity.  No doubt many of my readers have had the experience I have, of introducing two of one’s friends to each other for the first time, thinking that they will get along well because they both have the same favorite food, sports team, or film, as well as our friendship in common.  And then one is horribly embarrassed to find that, after a few minutes, there is an awkwardness because the two are not really well-suited to one another after all.

The use of new and social media can make things even more of a muddle, because the interaction begins with, and may in many cases always be limited to, words written or spoken on a screen.  You may enjoy someone’s tweets about history, or reading someone’s blog posts about cooking, and interacting with them about these things.  And over time you may come to think that you have thereby formed a friendship with the author of those tweets or posts.  Yet if and when you finally do meet them in person, you may find that although you still like them, there may not be enough of a connection between the two of you to sustain anything more than a warm acquaintanceship, similar to one you might have with a long-standing barber, tailor, or bank manager, which never evolves into an actual friendship.

If the creation of a friendship was an easily predictable phenomenon, akin to the rising of the sun or the phases of the moon, I suspect there would be little or no need for the use of new and social media to reach out and try to make new friendships.  If 1+1 always = 2 in this regard, we would simply be able to meet someone for the first time and say, “Because you like the music of Mahler, you must therefore be my friend,” and that would be the end of it.  Yet look how often even the most fundamental matters that shape our entire world view – religion, nationality, ethnicity, etc. – are no guarantee that someone will become our friend.

To save everyone a lot of heartache, let us admit to ourselves that we have no idea why some people become our friends, and some do not.  There are always people whom we are attracted to, and whom we would like to call our friends, but they for whatever reason do not share that attraction.  The reverse can also be true, when we feel put-upon by someone who is trying desperately to become our friend when really we are fine with remaining acquaintances, and are just trying to be polite and not hurt their feelings.  And although not the subject of today’s blog post, it goes without saying that when that uneven level of attraction is not one of friendship, but romantic in nature, things can become even more complicated.

These kinds of awkward situations are initially masked in both new and social media, because the online personae we create for ourselves can be as genuine or false, as improved-upon or warts-and-all, as we wish, since in most cases there is little or no chance that we will actually meet the other online person.  Those with a more dishonest personality, or some aspect of themselves they feel they have to hide, can take advantage of this situation in a way which they would not be able to do in a dinner party setting, for example, after the wine gets flowing and tongues begin to loosen in conversation.  As such, while not discounting the possibility that friendships can be formed from a tweet, or from podcast feedback, or the like, we need to be realistic in our assessment of them as gauges of potential friendship.

Fretting over the uncertainty that is the formation of a friendship is as useless as trying to figure out why one of your children loves broccoli, and the other goes into a screaming fit if you try to make him eat it.  Some aspects of human behavior simply have no rational basis of explanation other than the fact that we are all individuals with free will, who can make choices for ourselves that defy expectations.  Putting together two people with common interests may lead to the formation of a friendship, but it may not, and the cut-to-the-chase aspect of both new and social media, where we come to believe we actually know someone well whom we have never actually met, can prove to be a great disappointment if not approached with some caution.

So before you spill your guts at CPAC to that person with whom you exchanged online barbs about Newt Gingrich, gentle reader, take a moment to reflect on what you actually know about them.  Are you in the process of making a real friend, or are you tying an albatross around your neck which you will come to regret?  Friendships rarely form instantaneously, and the possibility of making a friend, rather than an acquaintance, exclusively through the use of media seems to me very remote.  While I am a user and advocate of both new and social media, I would urge you not to mistake online relationships for real-life ones, which take much longer to build, and require more than keystrokes.


Detail of “Portrait of Two Friends” by Jacopo Pontormo (1522)
Collezione Vittorio Cini, Venice

1 Comment

Filed under culture

Friendship and Frivolity

For those of us who scribble, today is an important date in the calendar for it is the Feast of St. Francis de Sales (1567-1622), patron saint of writers and journalists.  Yet before you tune out, gentle reader who is a non-Christian, I’d like you to consider some of what he wrote about other subjects.  Like Count Baldassare Castiglione, whose writing inspired and continues to inspire some of the subjects considered on this blog, St. Francis has quite a lot to say about how people should behave in society – which, as it happens, is still very relevant to us today, and particularly with respect to the friendships and attachments we form.

The reason St. Francis de Sales was named as the patron saint of writers and journalists, by Pope Pius XI, was not only because he wrote a number of important books, but also because of his methods.  In his efforts to evangelize and persuade people to come into the Church he often hand-wrote what today we would call flyers or tracts, which he would slip under the front door of homes who would not let him come in and speak to them.  One could also perhaps accuse him of starting the habit of leaving Chinese take-away menus under windshield wipers, but that is beside the point.

I have written previously about how St. Francis de Sales had some very sensible thoughts about fashion, of all things, which you might not expect from a man who was Bishop of Geneva and named a Doctor of the Church because of his significant theological writing and scholarship.  He recognized the reality that most people are not going to dress like nuns and hermits, particularly people who are well-to-do and have obligations to perform in society.  It is interesting that his thoughts, following the Reformation, are exactly in line with Castiglione’s own thinking and writing on this subject, before the Reformation took place.  The world may have changed dramatically during that intervening century, but the idea of good taste being marked by some degree of restraint is one which runs like – if you will forgive the expression – a thread through their work, and even up through the work of couturiers like Coco Chanel or Giorgio Armani.

Another area on which the two men agree has to do with what we might refer to as the formation of “serious” friendships, as opposed to superficial ones based on unimportant matters. Thinking that because two people like to follow the career of the same pop tart or the same sports team that said persons are, in fact, friends, is putting the cart before the horse. It may be a basis to begin building a friendship, but it cannot be the only basis for a true one.

Today one can look at the “Trending” column on Twitter, gossip magazines, or frankly even at most formerly-legitimate news outlets, and see all sorts of reports and commentary about entertainers, celebrities, or people who are famous for being famous. However this frivolity is nothing new, as St. Francis noted back in the 17th century. In criticizing the empty-headed people of his own day, he notes:

They do not at all hesitate to say: Such a gentleman has many virtues and perfections, for he dances gracefully, he plays well at all sorts of games, he dresses fashionably, he sings delightfully, speaks eloquently, and is good looking; thus mountebanks esteem those the most perfect among themselves who are the greatest buffoons But as all these things regard the senses, so the friendships which proceed from them are termed sensual, vain, and frivolous, and deserve rather the name of foolish fondness than of friendship; such are the ordinary friendships of young people, which are grounded on mustaches, locks, and glances, on clothes, affectation and chatter; friendships suited to the age of those lovers whose virtues are yet only tendrils, and their judgment only in the bud; such friendships are only temporary.

Perhaps today one would be hard-pressed to find a friendship grounded in a mutual appreciation of mustaches, though admittedly stranger things have happened. St. Francis is not saying that it is a bad thing to strike up a conversation with someone based on a mutual appreciation of or opinion on something frivolous, such as a television show. What he is saying is that those who never begin to discuss more serious matters with the people whom they spend time with are not really forming friendships at all, even if they refer to such relationships that way. These types of relationships have no real value, and can lead to a lowering of standards, as well as encouraging laziness, bad behavior and poor choices.

Similarly, Castiglione recognized the difference between frivolous attachment and serious friendship, and noted that those who associated with frivolous people would themselves be found frivolous, and lose their reputations:

But another thing seems to me to give and to take away from reputation greatly, and this is our choice of the friends with whom we are to live in intimate relations; for doubtless reason requires that they who are joined in close amity and fast companionship, shall have their desires, souls, judgments and minds also in accord. Thus, he who consorts with the ignorant or wicked, is deemed ignorant or wicked; and on the contrary, he who consorts with the good, the wise, and the discreet, is himself deemed to be the like. Because by nature everything seems to join willingly with its like. Therefore I think we ought to use great care in beginning these friendships, for he who knows one of two close friends, at once imagines the other to be of the same quality.

In both cases, neither man is saying that all of our relationships must be serious ones. After all, serious friendships cannot arise until there is at least some initial contact based on a shared interest or experience. Social occasions, entertainments, or even chance meetings have always lead to more intimacy, both in the Renaissance Europe of St. Francis and Castiglione, as well as in our own day. And certainly in the present age social media has made it possible for more people living at wider distances from one another to be able to form new relationships.

What both men are saying, however, is that a love of the vapid and the shallow is ultimately not a good basis for forming anything. Society presently elevates and celebrates frivolous, ongoing sexual encounters among unmarried people, or staged weddings spread across the pages of glossy publicity magazines, as being equivalent to a solemn, sacramental marriage between two adults before God, and we can see where that has brought us. Therefore it should not surprise us to find that, similarly, “friendship” has been cheapened to something which is really little more than an acquaintanceship, at best, and at worst, possibly a bad influence on our intellectual, moral, and spiritual health.

When the world has gone topsy-turvy, and paradoxically embraced “no standards” as THE standard, we do not need to re-invent the wheel to try to look to some sanity about the example we set for others.  History is there for us to make use of, if we will but take the time to do so.  So I suggest, gentle reader, that you take the counsel of these two noble writers from one of the high periods of Western culture to heart, and consider whether you are wasting your time on frivolous relationships, or whether you are, in fact, working on forming true friendships which will do you, the other person, and society as a whole some good.

Detail of “Members of the Amsterdam Goldsmiths’ Guild” by Thomas de Keyser (1627)
Museum of Art, Toledo, Ohio

2 Comments

Filed under culture