Tag Archives: Catholic

Friends in High Places: St. Rita of Cascia

Those of you who read me on a regular basis know that I have a long-standing devotion to St. Rita of Cascia (1381-1457).  Wife, mother, and after her widowhood and the death of her children an Augustinian nun, Margherita Lotti de Mancini lived a life full of both emotional and physical suffering, but remained steadfastly devoted to Christ, and bore her crosses as best she could.  Along with St. Jude, her prayerful intercession is often sought by those facing an impossible situation to which there seems to be no remedy.  Yet despite knowing much about her, I find there is always more to discover, making me ever-more convinced that she was a good friend to fall in with.

I was deeply touched at my birthday party recently to learn that a group of my friends had agreed to pray a Novena to St. Rita on behalf of my intentions.  For my non-Catholic readers, please note that this is not worship: Catholics draw a distinction between worship, which is confined to God alone, and prayers asking for intercession.    The belief that the Church on Earth is united with the Church in Heaven, i.e. those of us who have “made it”, as it were, means that we are asking those who are already in God’s Presence to add our prayers to theirs, just as you might offer to pray on behalf of a friend of yours who is going through a rough time.  In this case, over the years I have asked St. Rita to pray for me on many occasions, not because I was not already directly asking God for help, but because I felt that she would take up my pleading my cause as well.

There are many pious stories about the life of this particular saint, but one which I only recently became aware of involves her life-long devotion to St. John the Baptist, one of her patron saints; in fact she was baptized in the church named after the Baptist in her native Cascia.  Now as it happens, I have for many years thrown a party in June to celebrate St. John the Baptist’s birthday, which is a favorite custom in Catalonia.  However his unexpected connection with one of my favorite saints, who lived many centuries after him, was previously unknown to me.

St. Rita’s husband was one of the victims of the long-standing feud between the Guelphs and the Ghibellines, the two prominent political factions of Medieval Italy.  In Umbria, as indeed as common throughout Italy in this period, there were assassinations and resulting vendettas that led to a great deal of bloodshed in an endless cycle.  With the murder of her husband, and the subsequent death of both her sons from the Plague, St. Rita wanted to fulfill her childhood hope of becoming an Augustinian nun, a hope which she had not been able to fulfill because her parents had instead arranged her marriage.  However the convent refused to take her, partially because they were worried that the vendetta which surrounded St. Rita’s husband’s family would be brought to their doorstep.

Through prayer to St. John the Baptist and her other patron saints for their intercession, and despite her being a widow with no political power, St. Rita managed to bring about a peace agreement between her husband’s family and the family that had ordered his assassination.  This document was signed before Cascian officials in a public ceremony, and permanently put an end to the local feuding and revenge murders.  Now St. Rita was at last able to successfully return to the convent and ask for admittance.  In fact it is said that the gates of the convent were opened for her in a vision by St. John the Baptist and her other favorite saints.

Having friends in high places is always a good thing, whether you are trying to get a table at a good restaurant, or whether you want to be bumped up to first-class on a flight.  So having a friend in the ultimate high place of all is a very good thing indeed.  I would encourage all of my readers to learn more about this wonderful saint, who understood human suffering so well and united herself spiritually in prayer to the sufferings of Christ, to serve Him, her family, and her community.  She is a dear friend whom you will very much love getting to know.

Santarita

Detail of “St. Rita of Cascia” window (19th Century)
Cathedral of St. Mary, Austin, Texas

2 Comments

Filed under culture

It’s All Straw

The Twitterverse exploded this morning because of a tweet by Pope Francis: ”My thoughts turn to all who are unemployed, often as a result of a self-centred mindset bent on profit at any cost.”  Many of my fellow conservatives in particular were infuriated that the Holy Father would appear to lay the blame for unemployment at the feet of capitalism, which is not in fact what he was saying.   Yet in writing what he did, the Pope called attention to something which many devout Christians in the Western world regularly forget: this life will end, and sooner than you think.

Before we begin, a bit of history should be kept in mind here by conservatives who are hopping mad at the Holy Father today, and who will then jump for joy at what he might tweet next week.   Pope Francis was not advocating some sort of socialist economic model, or saying that capitalism is the work of the Devil.  Keep in mind that he was the Cardinal-Archbishop of Buenos Aires until just a few weeks ago.  If you know anything of what has happened to Argentina economically and politically over the past decade, the Pope is all too well-aware of the impact of various economic theories and practices.  Moreover, he was certainly no ally of the current populist-socialist President of Argentina, who imagines herself some sort of Kmart version of Eva Perón.

There are many areas of overlap between conservatism and Christianity, but there are also many areas of tension.  While recently a number of Christian denominations have adopted a policy of going along to get along, with regard to various societal and political issues, the Catholic Church remains immovable on a number of fundamental points, as she has for the past two thousand years of her existence.  One of those points is that love of both God and neighbor is the basis for the truly Christian life.  And while not in principle against the possession of wealth, the Christian does not make its pursuit his reason for living.

As we heard in the Gospel reading at mass this past Sunday, “‘I give you a new commandment: love one another. As I have loved you, so you also should love one another.  This is how all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.’ ” (St. John 13:34-35)

Nothing the Pope tweeted today was new, as you can see here for example, from two sections of the Catechism of the Catholic Church which point to the inherent dangers of both atheist socialism AND unfettered capitalism:

2124  The name “atheism” covers many very different phenomena. One common form is the practical materialism which restricts its needs and aspirations to space and time. Atheistic humanism falsely considers man to be “an end to himself, and the sole maker, with supreme control, of his own history.”  Another form of contemporary atheism looks for the liberation of man through economic and social liberation. “It holds that religion, of its very nature, thwarts such emancipation by raising man’s hopes in a future life, thus both deceiving him and discouraging him from working for a better form of life on earth.”

2424    A theory that makes profit the exclusive norm and ultimate end of economic activity is morally unacceptable. The disordered desire for money cannot but produce perverse effects. It is one of the causes of the many conflicts which disturb the social order.  A system that “subordinates the basic rights of individuals and of groups to the collective organization of production” is contrary to human dignity.  Every practice that reduces persons to nothing more than a means of profit enslaves man, leads to idolizing money, and contributes to the spread of atheism. “You cannot serve God and Mammon.”

Secular materialism is not an illness confined only to those who practice socialism.  There are many conservatives, including those who call themselves Christians, who bow and worship at the feet of people like economists and market gurus, leaving God out of the picture entirely, or relegating Him to some sort of secondary place in their lives.  This is a very dangerous path to tread, and a choice which Catholics believe has eternal consequences.

In St. Paul’s first letter to Timothy, the Apostle to the Gentiles lays out, very simply, why the pursuit of wealth leads nowhere:

For we brought nothing into the world, just as we shall not be able to take anything out of it.
If we have food and clothing, we shall be content with that.
Those who want to be rich are falling into temptation and into a trap and into many foolish and harmful desires, which plunge them into ruin and destruction.
For the love of money is the root of all evils, and some people in their desire for it have strayed from the faith and have pierced themselves with many pains.

(1 Timothy 6:7-10)

Please note, no one is saying that wealth is something which is inherently evil.  After all, the ministry of Christ Himself, and later that of the Apostles and the Church, would have been impossible without the material support of those Christians with the means to help.  Rather wealth is a tool, and what one does with that tool, for good or for ill, will give lie to what is really important in one’s life.  For in the end, no matter how much wealth one creates or accumulates, we are, all of us, worm food.

Many Catholics and non-Catholics alike are familiar with the prolific medieval writer St. Thomas Aquinas, one of the greatest thinkers of the Church.  One of my favorite passages from his copious output - and be assured I have not even read 1/100th of it – is something which I not infrequently recall to myself.  It is useful to keep in mind both when things go wrong in life, but also when things are going well.

While celebrating mass one day in 1273, St. Thomas apparently received a mystical vision of Heaven; as a result, he stopped writing to prepare himself spiritually to go home to the Lord.  ”All that I have written seems like straw to me,” he is reported to have said, in response to urges from others that he resume writing, “compared to what has been revealed to me.”  St. Thomas was by no means rejecting the work he had already done, nor its value to those whom it had helped and indeed continues to help to this day.  Rather he realized that all he had been working on and doing in the material world paled in comparison to what was coming across the great divide, and knew that he had to prepare himself for it, even as close as he was to God.

The fact is that the Pope is right.  Many times hard-working people find themselves unemployed not because they are lazy, or because they are doing a poor job, but because the wealthy chose to protect their own fortunes, and not care for their struggling workers.  This is not a blanket statement, nor an endorsement of trade unionism or forcible wealth distribution.  Rather it is a simple fact of life: these things do happen, and are happening all the time, all over the world.

The Pope is also correct in reminding us of the inherent human tendency of selfishness, and this is why Christianity, which is founded on a Divine act of loving unselfishness, is not as easy a Faith to take on as many of us would like to believe.  The Catholic Church was built on sacrifice and blood, both of Christ’s on Calvary, and of the countless martyrs who suffered torture and death rather than submit to selfishness and sin.  Human beings never like to be reminded of the fact that we are sinners; we all like to think that we are, to paraphrase C.S. Lewis, nice folks.  The truth is that under the right circumstances, we will not only take whatever we can from one another, but we will actually relish doing it – and that is what makes self-sacrifice such a very hard thing to achieve.

Thus Pope Francis’ job, lest those reading this forget it, is not to help the Republicans take over the Senate or lower the cost of crude oil.  The Holy Father is on Twitter not to chit-chat, but to get as many people to Heaven as he can.  You may not have thought about that, when you posted your snarky comment about the Pope this morning, but there it is.  He is trying to teach us both by word and by example what it means to be a Christian.  Sometimes that instruction is easily palatable, and sometimes we find it bitter and difficult to swallow.

For at the end of your life, God will not care whether you had 100 or 100,000 Twitter followers, or whether a celebrity re-tweeted you, or whether you appeared on Twitchy, BuzzFeed, or any other aggregate site.  Nor for that matter will He care whether you died a rich man or a poor one.   Rather, when you die and go before Him, you are going to have to show Him that you loved Him, as He loved you, and that you demonstrated that love in the way you treated other people, sacrificing your own comforts to meet someone else’s needs, in imitation of the same self-sacrificial love that Christ demonstrated to His followers.

Remember that, as He Himself pointed out, the Son of Man had nowhere to lay His head.  He was laid on a bed of straw which did not belong to Him at His birth, and He was laid in a rock tomb which did not belong to Him at His death, and from which He rose on Easter Sunday.   So now would be a good time to ask yourself, if you were angry at the Pope today, whether you are so detached from the world and materialism as to remember that if you are a Christian, these three things are more important to you than absolutely anything whatsoever having to do with the economy.  You are not made for this world, but for the next.

Tomasso

Detail of “The Vision of St. Thomas Aquinas” by Santi de Tito (1593)
San Marco, Florence

10 Comments

Filed under culture

Into the Lions’ Den

If you have been following the news lately then you are aware of a manufactured news story which made national headlines, about the effort by a group of gay marriage activists to remove a Catholic priest from the Newman Center ministry at George Washington University here in the Nation’s Capital for doing his job, i.e. teaching the Catholic faith, hard as it is for many to accept. What you will not be aware of is that the priest in question, Father Greg Shaffer, is a friend of mine, and someone whom I respect greatly. He has not asked me to write what I am about to share with you, and I will refrain from speaking about him personally other than in general terms. However there comes a time when attacking the Church moves from debates and hypotheticals into attacks on people whom we care about, and in fact on what forms the very essence of who we are as Christians. Therefore I hope Father Greg will forgive me for adding my two rather measly cents to circumstances in which he certainly needs no help from me, but in which I am proud to offer whatever support I can.

Sunday evening I had the privilege of attending a mass concelebrated by Father Greg with Cardinal Wuerl, Archbishop of Washington, and a number of other priests. Those of you who are regular readers of these pages know that Newman Center masses are not really my style, as guitars and what is referred to as “praise and worship music” make me wince. Nevertheless, this is a question of taste, for it has been a long time since I was an undergraduate, and more importantly there is no question whatsoever regarding Father Greg’s orthodoxy – he is probably the priest most passionately devoted to the Blessed Sacrament that I have ever met. Plus, when your Cardinal-Archbishop comes to visit, you can hardly want to stay away. Never let it be said that I have turned down an opportunity to kiss the episcopal ring.

The mass itself was beautiful, and the congregation full. We were very fortunate to have Cardinal Wuerl come straight from the airport off a flight from Rome in order to be able to celebrate with us and publicly demonstrate his support, and despite some obvious fatigue and jetlag His Eminence soldiered on. It was wonderful to see the outpouring of enthusiasm both for him, and for Father Greg among those assembled for mass.

Yet the most striking thing about the mass itself was unquestionably the Cardinal’s homily. Fortunately for those of you who were not able to attend this mass, the Cardinal has posted the text of this sermon on his blog, which you can read here. It is not only a powerful statement of support for Father Greg personally, the challenges of Christ’s teachings, and the dangers of limiting religious liberty, but more importantly I believe it is something that Catholics anywhere in this country, and indeed worldwide, can read to remind themselves that they are not alone. Indeed, toward the end of his homily, His Eminence quite literally brought me to tears when he said, “Dear brothers and sisters, never be ashamed of Christ, his Gospel, his Truth – or your identity as Jesus’ disciples. Always be proud of who you are.”

Cardinal Wuerl clearly knows what is happening in our society and is responding to it, in his own particular way and gentle charism, just as his brother bishops such as Cardinals Dolan and George, and Archbisshops Chaput and Lori, among others, are doing in their own dioceses. In doing so they are following in the footsteps of their predecessors in leading Christ’s flock, from St. Peter and the Apostles onward, even when it would be so much easier and more comfortable to say nothing. We all know from history that, apart from St. John Fisher, Bishop of Rochester, going along to get along is what happened to the English bishops, when Henry VIII decided that his own sexual incontinence was more important than his immortal soul, and indeed more important than the immortal souls of the English people.

How blessed we are, by contrast, that in the current age of impending persecution – for make no mistake, that day has arrived – that we Catholics have bishops, priests, and religious who are not afraid to witness to the truth of our Faith, through the teachings of Christ and His Church. We Catholics are all members of a Church on Earth made up entirely of sinners, who are constantly falling and having to pick ourselves up again. That is something which is hard enough to do when things are going relatively well. Yet to be able to do so while being under attack is something that will test not only the mettle of our shepherds, but our own as well.

daniel_in_the_lions

“Daniel in the Lion’s Den” by Briton Rivière (1872)
Walker Art Gallery, Liverpool

Leave a Comment

Filed under culture

How SQPN Prepared Me for the BBC

As you may have heard through other social media outlets, gentle reader, I was recently on BBC News talking about the election of Pope Francis as the new head of the Catholic Church.  I had held off blogging about this until now because the video was only uploaded to YouTube yesterday, and you can see the results here.  However I also wanted to connect this blog post with SQPN’s giving campaign, since without the experience of having been a regular panelist on the “Catholic Weekend” show on that network for the past year, I doubt very much I would have been ready for this rather unique opportunity.  Moreover, I want to encourage you to consider donating to SQPN as I do, to support their many terrific programs.

A week ago I received an email from someone claiming to be at the BBC in London, which arrived via the email address for this blog.  Curiously, the message began, “Dear Christopher,” which of course is not my name.  It then went on to invite me, as a Catholic blogger, to appear on a BBC discussion panel about the new pope.  I wrote back inquiring as to whether this was some sort of joke, and also pointing out that my name was not in fact Christopher.

The response came that in fact they had been looking for a British blogger, and somehow had ended up contacting me, which is rather odd because when they sent me the link to the blog they were trying to get in touch with, the site had been taken down.  There must have been some link to one of my posts, or some such thing, for The Beeb to end up at my online door.  After explaining that I was not the party in question, but that I was indeed a Catholic and a blogger, as well as a weekly podcast guest, the young lady at the BBC commented that I would be even better for this program than the person she had been trying to locate.

After a lengthy pre-interview conversation via Skype, it was arranged that I should be at the BBC’s studios here in Washington the following morning by 10:30 am.  Fortunately by pure chance I had already made arrangements that evening to have dinner with an old friend and his wife – who just so happens to be from Buenos Aires.  It allowed me the chance to talk to two people with a more secular outlook on the world about their perceptions and thoughts regarding Pope Francis.  It was not a practice run, but  something more like airing ideas that allowed me to come down to some key talking points later.

I arrived earlier than I needed to at the BBC, and sat around for a bit waiting for things to happen.  I had been in a television studio once before in high school, to tape a local commercial about not drinking and driving during prom season – which in my case was not a problem since I did not go to my prom anyway.  However this of course was the newsroom-television studio of the legendary British Broadcasting Corporation, the largest news-gathering organization in the world, and that is somewhat quite different to anticipate.  For here, you are not so much thinking about whether you are going to embarrass your parents, but whether you are going to embarrass your country or your Church, before billions of people who watch the BBC all over the world.

Now there is nothing particularly glamorous about the newsroom of the BBC in Washington when you actually get to see it in person, which I imagine is rather what other international news organizations’ newsrooms are like as well.  There is a strange mixture of people in shirts and ties mingling about with people who look as though they have slept in a mechanic’s jumpsuit for a week.  There are tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of equipment hanging about everywhere, big lines of duct tape running every which way all over the carpets, and people running in and out doing whatever it is they are doing.  It reminded me more of a doctor’s waiting room than the theatre.

Indeed, when they took me back to the camera room where I would be shooting, with its animated backdrop of the White House, the space felt eerily reminiscent of going to have x-rays taken.  I was hooked up with a microphone and earpiece, and told where to look, and where to sit.  Then a British voice came on in my ear from London telling me what to do, and that periodic whisper in my ear became my lifeline for the next hour or so.

Everyone was very kind and tried to put me at ease, though of course because I was in a remote studio rather than on set in London, at the time it was difficult to know for certain whether I was coming across well or not.  In our normal conversations with other people we have not only their voices, but also their facial expressions, gestures, and so on to tell us whether we are getting through to them, making them upset, or what have you.  When you are simply listening to disembodied voices, as I was, it is a bit more difficult to know whether you are doing it right.

And yet ironically enough, it was at this precise moment where my past year of experience on SQPN’s “Catholic Weekend” show came in tremendously useful.  Originally we recorded the show via Skype, just using voices, which of course makes sense since a podcast is more like a radio show than a television program.  As a result, one became more and more accustomed to listening for those audio cues and breaks to step in or to step back.  It is a skill which I still have to master, but which I am certainly getting better at with time.

Thus, even though I could not see anyone I was talking to on the BBC, I very quickly fell into the same pattern I would have recording an episode of “Catholic Weekend” – albeit not in my jammies with a cup of coffee,  sifting through the technical train wreckage and laughing at bad puns before we go on the air.  Nevertheless it turned out to be wonderful training for this, which meant that whatever I may have looked like, I felt very relaxed on camera.  It is difficult to describe but once the lights go on, YOU go on, as well.  Concerns about whether you will do well or not simply evaporate and you just do what you are there to do.

The reader – or rather, viewer – can judge for himself whether he thinks I did well or not, but I will say that my “handler” at the BBC emailed me when I returned to the office and told me I did great and that they would love to have me on again if I were willing.  It remains to be seen whether I will do so, since it is unlikely they will cover a topic of such interest to me personally again any time soon.  However I do want to say how grateful I am to them for giving me this opportunity not only to speak about my Faith and about our new Holy Father Pope Francis, but also to Father Roderick, Captain Jeff, and everyone at SQPN, for without the past year of experience in podcasting I would probably not have done nearly as decent a job as I (arguably) did.

BBC

The author looking somewhat smug in his Churchill dot necktie.

13 Comments

Filed under culture

My Piece for The Catholic Herald (UK): “The Capuchin with a Gentle Heart”

Thanks to the graciousness of Editor Luke Coppen, I was recently asked to write an article about Seán Patrick O’Malley, Cardinal Archbishop of Boston, for The Catholic Herald in the UK.  As you may know from the reporting on the lead-up to the coming conlave to elect a new pope, Cardinal Seán has been mentioned in a number of quarters as a potential contender for the office of Supreme Pontiff, though as I have said before keep in mind this is not a political campaign election as we understand it in the secular world.  That being said, this is a good opportunity for Catholics and non-Catholics alike to get to know more about some of the men who are shepherding Catholicism in the 21st century, and to see what a broad of experience they have in giving their lives to the service of God and His Church.

The piece  appeared in this weekend’s edition, and my good friend Sean McCarney of the Just A Catholic Dad podcast is mailing me a copy.  I look forward to adding it to my clippings file, and of course those of my readers in the UK can pick themselves up a copy at the news agents or their local parish.  In the meantime however, for those not in the UK, another good friend in the Mother Country, Father James Bradley of the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham, sent me a scan of the article itself, which appears below.  In order to read it you may need to use the zoom feature on your browser.

I must also by way of conclusion give a very special thanks to Father Robert Reed of Catholic TV in Boston, who kindly agreed to share some of his thoughts and experiences about working with the Cardinal for this article.

image

Leave a Comment

Filed under culture